Skip to main content
The Perpetual Line-Up
  • Executive Summary
    • Key Findings
    • Recommendations
  • Introduction
  • Background
    • What is Face Recognition Technology?
    • Unique Risks of Face Recognition
    • How Does Law Enforcement Use Face Recognition?
    • Our Research
  • Risk Framework
    • Risk Factors
    • Risk Framework
  • Findings & Scorecard
    • Deployment
    • Fourth Amendment
    • Free Speech
    • Accuracy
    • Racial Bias
    • Transparency & Accountability
  • Recommendations
    • Legislatures
    • Law Enforcement
    • The National Institute of Standards & Technology
    • Face Recognition Companies
    • Community Leaders
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Methodology
  • Model Face Recognition Legislation
  • Model Police Face Recognition Use Policy
  • Contact
View Map View Scorecard
Twitter link for GeorgetownCPT Facebook link for GeorgetownCPT Email Clare.Garvie@georgetown.edu PDFversion of report
© 2016 Center on Privacy & Technology at Georgetown Law,
all rights reserved.
Home
The Perpetual Line-Up

Jurisdiction

Arizona

State Police used face recognition until 2013.  
In June 2016, GAO reported FBI negotiations to search license photos. GAO later retracted that claim at FBI's request.  
Pinal County Sheriff and Tucson Police stated they don't use face recognition. 
Phoenix Police had no responsive records.  
People in Database Real-Time Use 4th Amendment Free Speech Accuracy Transparency Audits

© 2016 Center on Privacy & Technology at Georgetown Law, all rights reserved. Site by Rootid